Definition of terms in Variety Development systems and Maintenance Breeding

Overview: The development and maintenance of varieties is the cornerstone of modern plant breeding. A clear understanding of key terminology — spanning biological, legal, and agronomic dimensions — is essential for breeders, researchers, and policymakers. The following notes systematically define each category as recognised under international frameworks including UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), PPVFR Act 2001 (India), and the ITPGRFA.

Core Definitions

01 Variety also: Plant Variety Foundational

A variety is a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank that can be:

  • Defined by the expression of the characteristics resulting from a given genotype or combination of genotypes;
  • Distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of those characteristics; and
  • Considered as a unit with regard to its suitability for being propagated unchanged.
Legal Note This definition is enshrined in Article 1(vi) of the UPOV Convention (1991) and adopted by the PPVFR Act 2001 (Section 2(za), India). The concept implies both genetic distinctness and propagation stability.
Example IR-64 (rice), HD-2967 (wheat), and Pusa Basmati-1 are registered varieties — each is distinct, uniform, and stable enough to be legally recognised.
02 Cultivar = Cultivated Variety Botanical / Agronomic

A cultivar (from cultivated variety) is a variety that has been selected, improved, and is maintained under cultivation. It is the standard unit in horticulture and agronomy used to refer to a named plant grouping with consistent, heritable traits distinguishing it from other plants of the same species.

  • Named according to the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP);
  • Must satisfy criteria of Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS);
  • The cultivar name is placed in single quotation marks — e.g., Mangifera indica 'Alphonso'.
Key Distinction All cultivars are varieties, but not all varieties are cultivars. The term "cultivar" specifically implies intentional selection and cultivation management. Wild or naturalised populations are varieties but not cultivars.
Example Solanum lycopersicum 'Roma', Rosa 'Peace', Triticum aestivum 'Sonalika' — all are formally named cultivars.
03 Extant Variety PPVFR Act

An extant variety is any variety — whether a farmers' variety, a variety about which there is common knowledge, or any other variety — that is in existence at the time of coming into force of the PPVFR Act, 2001.

  • Includes varieties notified under the Seeds Act, 1966;
  • Varieties for which farmers' varieties are the basis;
  • Varieties about which there is common knowledge — documented in literature, traditional use, or folk records;
  • Any other variety in existence at the commencement of the Act.
Legal Significance Under Section 2(j) of the PPVFR Act 2001, extant varieties can be registered for protection without the mandatory 10-year commercialisation requirement imposed on new varieties. This provision safeguards publicly known cultivated material from biopiracy by providing legal recognition.
Example Basmati rice varieties like Taraori Basmati, cultivated for centuries in the Indo-Gangetic plains and documented in literature, qualify as extant varieties.
04 Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) UPOV 1991 · IPR

An essentially derived variety (EDV) is a variety that is predominantly derived from the initial (reference) variety — or from a variety that is itself predominantly derived from the initial variety — while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of that initial variety.

Derivation may occur through:

  • Selection of a natural or induced mutant or a somaclonal variant;
  • Repeated backcrossing;
  • Transformation by genetic engineering;
  • Any other method of derivation that preserves the essential genotype of the initial variety.
Legal Significance (UPOV 1991, Article 14(5)) The breeder of the initial variety retains the right to authorise commercialisation of the EDV. This provision was introduced to prevent "cosmetic breeding" — the practice of making minor modifications to an existing protected variety to evade IP rights.
Three Criteria for an EDV (1) Predominantly derived from the initial variety; (2) Clearly distinguishable from the initial variety; (3) Conforms to the initial variety in all essential characteristics resulting from the genotype.
Example A GM variety created by inserting a Bt gene into a protected parent line, while retaining all other morphological and agronomic characters of that parent, is an EDV of the parent variety.
05 Independently Derived Variety Breeding Law

An independently derived variety is a variety that has been developed separately, through independent research and breeding effort, without making use of the protected initial variety as a direct progenitor. Despite potentially resembling a protected variety in some traits, it has its own separate breeding pedigree.

  • The breeder must be able to demonstrate that the variety was developed without access to, or use of, the protected initial variety;
  • An independently derived variety does not fall under the EDV provisions;
  • Its commercialisation does not require authorisation from the breeder of the similar-looking protected variety.
Significance The concept of independent derivation is critical to ensuring that breeders are not penalised for parallel innovation — arriving at similar phenotypic results through entirely separate breeding pathways. Proof of independent derivation typically involves documented pedigree records, field trials, and germplasm access logs.
Example Two breeding programmes in different countries independently selecting for disease resistance in rice may produce phenotypically similar varieties; if the germplasm sources were independent, neither is an EDV of the other.
06 Reference Variety also: Initial Variety DUS Testing

A reference variety (sometimes called the initial variety in the EDV context) is a previously registered or well-documented variety used as a standard for comparison during DUS (Distinctness, Uniformity, Stability) testing to assess the novelty and distinctness of a candidate variety.

  • Must be representative of the known variation within the crop species;
  • Selected by the authority conducting DUS trials (e.g., PPV&FRA in India);
  • The candidate variety must be clearly distinguishable from all reference varieties in at least one characteristic;
  • In the EDV context, the reference variety is the initial protected variety from which the derived variety was predominantly obtained.
Role in DUS Testing DUS tests compare the candidate variety against a set of reference varieties grown in the same trial. Morphological, physiological, and sometimes biochemical descriptors are measured. Distinctness requires a clear and consistent difference in at least one descriptor from all reference varieties.
Example When registering a new wheat variety in India, varieties like HD-2781 or PBW-343 may serve as reference varieties in comparative DUS trials.

Farmers' Varieties, Landraces & Traditional Germplasm

07 Farmers' Variety PPVFR Act · ITPGRFA

A farmers' variety is a variety that has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by farmers through their own breeding and selection practices, and is associated with naturally evolved traits under specific farming conditions. Under Section 2(l) of the PPVFR Act 2001, a farmers' variety means a variety that:

  • Has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields; or
  • Is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which farmers possess the common knowledge.
Farmers' Rights The PPVFR Act, 2001 recognises farmers not only as cultivators but as breeders. Farmers have the right to save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share, or sell farm produce including seeds of any variety, including a protected variety — except that selling of branded seed of a protected variety is not permitted. Farmers' varieties can be registered under a relaxed DUS criterion.
Benefit Sharing If a commercial breeder uses a farmers' variety as a parent in developing a new registered variety, the farming community is entitled to benefit sharing through the National Gene Fund established under the Act.
Example Navara rice (Kerala), Kalanamak rice (UP), Anaji wheat — all are farmers' varieties developed and conserved over generations by farming communities.
08 Landrace Ethnobotany ·
Genetic Resources

A landrace is a locally adapted, traditional variety of a domesticated animal or plant species that has developed over time through adaptation to its natural and cultural environment. It has not been subjected to formal, systematic plant breeding but has evolved under farmer selection and natural selection pressures over long periods.

Key characteristics of landraces:

  • Local adaptation: Highly suited to local soils, climate, pest/disease pressure, and farming systems;
  • Genetic heterogeneity: Unlike modern pure-line varieties, landraces are populations with considerable internal genetic diversity;
  • Stability: Show buffered, stable performance across variable environments through population-level buffering;
  • Cultural identity: Often embedded in local food systems, cuisine, and cultural practices;
  • Farmer-maintained: Seed is saved and exchanged within and between communities.
Landrace vs. Farmers' Variety The terms are often used interchangeably but can be distinguished: landraces typically refer to older, more genetically diverse population-level material with pre-scientific history, while farmers' varieties may include more recently selected, relatively uniform material developed by farmers within living memory. All landraces are farmers' varieties in the broad sense, but not all farmers' varieties are landraces.
Conservation Importance Landraces are reservoirs of allelic diversity for traits such as drought tolerance, disease resistance, quality traits, and stress adaptation — often not found in elite modern germplasm. They are prioritised in in situ conservation (on-farm conservation) strategies under the CBD and ITPGRFA.
Examples Emmer wheat landraces in Ethiopia; Anasazi bean landraces of Native Americans; Ranbhoomi rice landraces of Odisha; Black-eyed pea landraces of West Africa.

Population Structures: Hybrids & Populations

09 Hybrid (F₁ Hybrid) Commercial Breeding

A hybrid variety is the first filial generation (F₁) offspring resulting from a controlled cross between two or more genetically distinct, often homozygous inbred parental lines. The offspring typically exhibit heterosis (hybrid vigour) — a phenotypic superiority over both parents in traits such as yield, growth rate, stress tolerance, and uniformity.

Types of hybrids:

  • Single cross hybrid: A × B → F₁ (two inbred lines); highest heterosis, most expensive to produce;
  • Three-way cross hybrid: (A × B) × C → uniform hybrid from three lines;
  • Double cross hybrid: (A × B) × (C × D) → used where single-cross seed yield is poor;
  • Top cross hybrid: Inbred line × open-pollinated variety; simpler, less intensive;
  • Intervarietal hybrid: Cross between two OPVs, used in some vegetable crops.
Production Systems Commercial hybrid seed production requires controlled pollination, achieved through emasculation + hand pollination (vegetables), cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) systems (e.g., rice, sorghum, sunflower), or self-incompatibility systems (e.g., cabbage, radish). The three-line system (A-line/CMS, B-line/maintainer, R-line/restorer) is widely used in rice hybrid production.
Seed Industry Significance Hybrids provide natural IP protection: F₂ seed shows transgressive segregation and yield decline (~15–20%), forcing farmers to repurchase seed annually from certified producers. This underpins the commercial seed industry for crops like maize, sorghum, sunflower, and vegetables.
Examples DHAN-1 (maize hybrid); Pusa RH-10 (rice hybrid); Kaveri 9001 (cotton hybrid); PHB-71 (sorghum hybrid); Monsanto's 900M series (corn hybrids).
10 Population / Variety-Population / Open-Pollinated Variety (OPV) Population Genetics

In plant breeding, a population is a genetically heterogeneous group of individuals of a common species that interbreed freely within the group and share a common gene pool. Unlike pure-line varieties or hybrids, populations contain substantial genetic variability and are in a state of dynamic equilibrium.

Key attributes:

  • Open-pollinated varieties (OPVs): Named, stabilised populations that breed true enough to be released as varieties; seed can be saved and replanted with acceptable performance;
  • Genetic diversity: Enables population-level buffering against biotic and abiotic stresses — no single genotype is exposed; the population adapts;
  • Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE): Allele frequencies remain stable across generations under random mating without selection, mutation, drift, or migration;
  • Breeding populations: Base material for recurrent selection, mass selection, and population improvement programmes (e.g., S₁ family selection, half-sib selection).
Variety-Population vs. Pure-Line Variety A pure-line variety is homozygous and uniform (e.g., selected from a selfing species); a variety-population (OPV) is heterozygous and heterogeneous — it is released as a named variety but contains a range of genotypes that collectively meet DUS criteria at the population level rather than at the individual plant level.
Role in Recurrent Selection Populations serve as the starting material for recurrent selection (mass selection, half-sib, full-sib, S₁/S₂ progeny selection, reciprocal recurrent selection) — the systematic improvement of population mean and specific traits over cycles while maintaining genetic diversity. This is the principal strategy for improving cross-pollinated crops like maize, pearl millet, and sorghum.
Examples Composite varieties (e.g., Vijay Composite maize), synthetic varieties (e.g., Ganga-5 maize OPV), pearl millet OPV Raj-171, and sorghum OPV CSH-15R.

Comparative Summary

Term Genetic Structure Origin Seed Saving IPR Status
Variety / Cultivar Defined; uniform & stable Formal breeding or selection Possible (if non-protected) Registerable under UPOV/PPVFR
Extant Variety Variable; pre-existing Pre-Act existence; common knowledge Yes Registerable without commercialisation period
EDV Predominantly same as initial variety Derived from protected variety Conditional Requires initial breeder's authorisation
Independently Derived Similar to protected; independent origin Parallel breeding, no access to initial Yes Independent rights; not an EDV
Reference Variety Documented; benchmark Pre-existing registered material Used in DUS comparisons only
Farmers' Variety Moderately variable Farmer selection over generations Unrestricted Registerable; farmers retain full use rights
Landrace Genetically heterogeneous Natural + farmer selection; ancient origin Unrestricted Community IP; CBD/ITPGRFA protection
Hybrid (F₁) Uniform F₁; heterozygous Controlled cross of inbred lines Not recommended (F₂ breakdown) Natural protection; trade secret (parental lines)
Population / OPV Genetically diverse Mass/recurrent selection; composite/synthetic Yes; stable across generations Registerable; publicly available

Key Conceptual Distinctions

Variety vs. Cultivar

"Variety" is the broader legal/biological term used in seed laws and taxonomy. "Cultivar" is the botanical term used in the ICNCP, specifically implying cultivation and management. All cultivars are varieties; not all varieties are cultivars.

EDV vs. Independently Derived Variety

Both may phenotypically resemble the initial protected variety, but their legal status differs entirely. The key is provenance: was the protected variety used as a progenitor? EDV → yes. Independently derived → no.

Landrace vs. Farmers' Variety

Landraces are genetically heterogeneous, ancient populations; farmers' varieties may be more recently selected and relatively uniform. Landraces emphasise ecological adaptation; farmers' varieties emphasise human-directed selection and cultural use.

Hybrid vs. Population

A hybrid (F₁) is the product of a specific, deliberate cross producing a uniform, heterozygous generation. A population is an interbreeding group maintained over cycles. Hybrids collapse in F₂; populations remain relatively stable across generations.

Extant Variety vs. New Variety

New varieties must meet commercial novelty (not sold before a prescribed period). Extant varieties are pre-existing and bypass this novelty requirement, qualifying directly for registration based on DUS and distinctness from known material.

Reference Variety vs. Initial Variety

A reference variety is used in DUS testing for distinctness comparisons. An initial variety is used in the EDV context to denote the protected parent from which an EDV was predominantly derived. These roles may overlap if the protected variety is also used as a DUS benchmark.

Key Regulatory Frameworks Referenced

  • UPOV Convention (1978 & 1991 Acts) — International framework for Plant Breeders' Rights; introduced EDV provisions in 1991;
  • PPVFR Act 2001 (India) — Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights; unique in recognising farmers as breeders and providing benefit-sharing mechanisms;
  • CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992) — Sovereign rights over genetic resources; access and benefit-sharing;
  • ITPGRFA (International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2001) — Multilateral system for access to PGRFA; Farmers' Rights;
  • Seeds Act, 1966 (India) — Governs notification and quality standards for extant and new varieties;
  • ICNCP (International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants) — Governs cultivar naming conventions.

About the author

M.S. Chaudhary
I'm an ordinary student of agriculture.

Post a Comment